<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Liquidity Finally Return to MicroCaps?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://microcapclub.com/2012/05/could-liquidity-finally-return-to-microcaps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://microcapclub.com/2012/05/could-liquidity-finally-return-to-microcaps/</link>
	<description>The Premier MicroCapClub</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Cassel</title>
		<link>http://microcapclub.com/2012/05/could-liquidity-finally-return-to-microcaps/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Cassel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microcapclub.com/?p=991#comment-588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony: Thanks for the comment.  I agree we haven&#039;t seen the $1 listing requirement we had hoped for, but what we have seen in the last 6 months is the NASDAQ lower their initial listing requirement from a mandatory $4 per share to $3 and even $2 in some instances so this is good progress.  Also, the JOBS Act is allowing private companies an easier public path via mini-IPO&#039;s per se ($5m minimum) with direct listing on the NASDAQ.  Again, steps in the right direction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony: Thanks for the comment.  I agree we haven&#8217;t seen the $1 listing requirement we had hoped for, but what we have seen in the last 6 months is the NASDAQ lower their initial listing requirement from a mandatory $4 per share to $3 and even $2 in some instances so this is good progress.  Also, the JOBS Act is allowing private companies an easier public path via mini-IPO&#8217;s per se ($5m minimum) with direct listing on the NASDAQ.  Again, steps in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://microcapclub.com/2012/05/could-liquidity-finally-return-to-microcaps/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microcapclub.com/?p=991#comment-587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ian-
Do you know when the BX venture Market opens it&#039;s doors for new issuer listings?
We need an exchange to cater to companies between OTC-BB and Nasdaq SC.  Looks like this is going to be that bridge.  I just have NOT heard any more news on this since 2011.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian-<br />
Do you know when the BX venture Market opens it&#8217;s doors for new issuer listings?<br />
We need an exchange to cater to companies between OTC-BB and Nasdaq SC.  Looks like this is going to be that bridge.  I just have NOT heard any more news on this since 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Cassel</title>
		<link>http://microcapclub.com/2012/05/could-liquidity-finally-return-to-microcaps/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Cassel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 13:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microcapclub.com/?p=991#comment-362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fascinating article in The Economist

The endangered public company
The rise and fall of a great invention, and why it matters
http://www.economist.com/node/21555562]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fascinating article in The Economist</p>
<p>The endangered public company<br />
The rise and fall of a great invention, and why it matters<br />
<a href="http://www.economist.com/node/21555562" rel="nofollow">http://www.economist.com/node/21555562</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Cassel</title>
		<link>http://microcapclub.com/2012/05/could-liquidity-finally-return-to-microcaps/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Cassel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microcapclub.com/?p=991#comment-360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[zamboni, how dare you think logically ;)  Agreed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zamboni, how dare you think logically <img src='http://microcapclub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   Agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZAMBONI</title>
		<link>http://microcapclub.com/2012/05/could-liquidity-finally-return-to-microcaps/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>ZAMBONI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microcapclub.com/?p=991#comment-359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish I had time to do a study that the lack of funding over the past number of years for micro caps has a direct impact on the real unemployment today above 10%. Granted many micro cap companies &quot;stole&quot; investor money but that is not the  reason to throw all micro cap funding away altogether because they are the job creators. 
It is not funny that taxpayers support big banks like Chase with FDIC insurance and they can trade securities that employee 3 people yet &quot;can&quot; lose 2 BILLION.  Why can&#039;t they  figure out how to approve 10,000 loans at 200k each support small business. With logic like that, will we ever get to full employment? Hopefully the &quot;jobs act&quot; will turn the tide.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I had time to do a study that the lack of funding over the past number of years for micro caps has a direct impact on the real unemployment today above 10%. Granted many micro cap companies &#8220;stole&#8221; investor money but that is not the  reason to throw all micro cap funding away altogether because they are the job creators.<br />
It is not funny that taxpayers support big banks like Chase with FDIC insurance and they can trade securities that employee 3 people yet &#8220;can&#8221; lose 2 BILLION.  Why can&#8217;t they  figure out how to approve 10,000 loans at 200k each support small business. With logic like that, will we ever get to full employment? Hopefully the &#8220;jobs act&#8221; will turn the tide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Cassel</title>
		<link>http://microcapclub.com/2012/05/could-liquidity-finally-return-to-microcaps/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Cassel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 02:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microcapclub.com/?p=991#comment-358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Andy.  LOL yeah it does sound like monopoly.  As long as the company performs I don&#039;t mind a lack of liquidity because that will eventually change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andy.  LOL yeah it does sound like monopoly.  As long as the company performs I don&#8217;t mind a lack of liquidity because that will eventually change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyran</title>
		<link>http://microcapclub.com/2012/05/could-liquidity-finally-return-to-microcaps/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>andyran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 01:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microcapclub.com/?p=991#comment-357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good read Ian.  I thought it was more fun when it was just 5 or 10 guys trading the same names...like an endless game of Monopoly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read Ian.  I thought it was more fun when it was just 5 or 10 guys trading the same names&#8230;like an endless game of Monopoly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
